Difference between PCS Thinline and PCS Classic symbols

Recently we have had a lot people asking us about the difference between the PCS Thinline symbols and PCS Classic symbols that are available to use with the Boardmaker Software Family. You can read about the new Thinline symbols in a blog I wrote earlier in the year.

The new PCS Thinline symbols could be described as age generic, with a more detailed look and clean lines compared to the PCS Classic symbols.

PCS Classic symbols in the top row and PCS Thinline symbols in the bottom row.

As with most symbols, different individuals will have their own preferences. When you can, it’s always a good idea to involve the user of the symbols and see what they prefer. Or if you’re like me and you make lots of resources, you’ll want as many symbols as you can get your hands on so that you have all available options.

Either way, you can have fun with these additional options at your fingertips.

This entry was posted in Tools & Resources and tagged with
Bookmark the permalink

About Charlene Cullen

Charlene has worked as a speech pathologist in the disability field for over 14 years. Various roles have included working as a therapist, supervisor and resource consultant with the Disability Services Commission in Western Australia. More recently she has worked for Spectronics as an inclusive technology consultant across Australia and New Zealand. Over this time she has developed a wealth of knowledge in practical applications of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and assistive technology and has a strong desire to support and educate parents, teachers, therapists and others in using inclusive technologies.

One Response to Difference between PCS Thinline and PCS Classic symbols

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>